On 01/03/2011 02:00 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [ please keep CCs ]
>
> Am 03.01.2011 13:27, Markus Duft wrote:
>> On 01/03/2011 01:15 PM, Markus Duft wrote:
>>> On 01/03/2011 12:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> [snip]
>> [snip]
>>> actually, i find that Ted Harkington was right: in 0.11.1 i can debug 32
[ please keep CCs ]
Am 03.01.2011 13:27, Markus Duft wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 01:15 PM, Markus Duft wrote:
>> On 01/03/2011 12:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> [snip]
> [snip]
>> actually, i find that Ted Harkington was right: in 0.11.1 i can debug 32 bit
>> code with qemu-system-x86_64 well enough (whi
On 01/03/2011 01:15 PM, Markus Duft wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 12:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> [snip]
[snip]
> actually, i find that Ted Harkington was right: in 0.11.1 i can debug 32 bit
> code with qemu-system-x86_64 well enough (which means i debugged all the 32
> bit part of my kernel without ever
On 01/03/2011 12:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> 1) is this a problem with qemu or was qemu "fixed" and gdb has a problem?
>>(that's why i CCd the gdb list ;)).
>> 2) is there any plan to fix this issue?
>> 3) is there some kind of workaround i can use (i'd be happy with an
>> ugly/unsup
Am 03.01.2011 11:27, Markus Duft wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have been playing a little with this: I'm writing a kernel for both x86 and
> x86-64. While doing so, i'd like to debug the kernel using qemu (and it's gdb
> stub) and gdb. This worked very well until qemu-0.11.1 (gdb version does not
> seem t