On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:27:58PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On the last kvm conf call Anthony said that he'll be happy to
> include an updated seabios with qemu 0.13.1, so a new release would
> be appreciated.
I branched and tagged "rel-0.6.1.1". It only has 6d5a2172
cherry-picked into it.
-Ke
On 10/25/2010 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
I'm okay with making tags and branches of seabios for bug fixes. So
far qemu/kvm has just grabbed various builds of seabios - is it
worthwhile to branch off of the seabios-0.6.1 version - which would
mean qemu/kvm would pull in additional changes beyond
On 10/23/2010 04:12 PM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:07:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> How do we manage the stable series wrt this issue?
>
> qemu-kvm-0.12.5 has a regression within the stable series that this
> patch fixes. qemu 0.12.5 does not, but only because it does
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:07:17PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> How do we manage the stable series wrt this issue?
>
> qemu-kvm-0.12.5 has a regression within the stable series that this
> patch fixes. qemu 0.12.5 does not, but only because it does not
> emulate polarity in the I/O APIC correctly.
On 10/21/2010 04:00 AM, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:34:41AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> In PIIX4 SCI (irq9) is active high. Seabios marks it so in interrupt
> override table, but some OSes (FreeBSD) require the same information to
> be present in DSDT too. Make it so.
>
