On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Blue Swirl writes:
>
>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> We have PRI*64 just for this purpo
Blue Swirl writes:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The
discussion about that was earlier
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>> We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The
>>> discussion about that was earlier.
>>
>> How does mingw matt
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 02:51:26PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The
>> discussion about that was earlier.
>
> How does mingw matter for vhost-net specific code?
>
> Paolo
Good point. That code is
On 05/30/2010 08:19 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
We have PRI*64 just for this purpose, so let's use them. The
discussion about that was earlier.
How does mingw matter for vhost-net specific code?
Paolo
