On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.12.2010 21:18, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 04.12.2010 19:35, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Stefan Weil
wrote:
>
> Am 24.11.2010 22:4
Am 04.12.2010 21:18, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 04.12.2010 19:35, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Stefan Weil
wrote:
Am 24.11.2010 22:46, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Hello,
with these patches, hopefully all functions with prin
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 04.12.2010 19:35, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 24.11.2010 22:46, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Hello,
with these patches, hopefully all functions with printf like argument
Am 04.12.2010 19:35, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 24.11.2010 22:46, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Hello,
with these patches, hopefully all functions with printf like arguments
use gcc's format checking, so the TODO comment in HACKING can be
removed.
The
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 24.11.2010 22:46, schrieb Stefan Weil:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> with these patches, hopefully all functions with printf like arguments
>> use gcc's format checking, so the TODO comment in HACKING can be removed.
>>
>> The patch series was tested wi
Am 24.11.2010 22:46, schrieb Stefan Weil:
Hello,
with these patches, hopefully all functions with printf like arguments
use gcc's format checking, so the TODO comment in HACKING can be removed.
The patch series was tested with a default build configuration on linux
and windows hosts (including
