Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 0/8 RFC] boot order specification

2010-11-04 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 10:24:45AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Gleb Natapov writes: > > > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:25:53PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > >> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 01:40:01PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > >> > This is current sate of the patch series for people to comment

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 0/8 RFC] boot order specification

2010-11-04 Thread Markus Armbruster
Gleb Natapov writes: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:25:53PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote: >> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 01:40:01PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> > This is current sate of the patch series for people to comment on. >> > I tried to use open firmware naming scheme to specify device path na

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 0/8 RFC] boot order specification

2010-11-01 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 06:25:53PM -0400, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 01:40:01PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > This is current sate of the patch series for people to comment on. > > I tried to use open firmware naming scheme to specify device path names. > > > > The patch seri

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv2 0/8 RFC] boot order specification

2010-10-31 Thread Kevin O'Connor
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 01:40:01PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > This is current sate of the patch series for people to comment on. > I tried to use open firmware naming scheme to specify device path names. > > The patch series produce names like these: > for pci machine: > /p...@i0cf8/pci-isa-bri.