Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] qed: Consistency check support

2010-10-28 Thread Avi Kivity
On 10/28/2010 12:51 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > Opening the file read-only first and reopening it read-write when the > migration has completed would be much better. No image format driver > would have to be changed for that. I agree. I'm not sure whether NFS guarantees we see the latest

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] qed: Consistency check support

2010-10-28 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 28.10.2010 12:15, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >> On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >>> Am 22.10.2010 16:56, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: This patch adds support for the qemu-img check command.  It also introduces a dirty

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] qed: Consistency check support

2010-10-28 Thread Kevin Wolf
Am 28.10.2010 12:15, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: > On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: >> Am 22.10.2010 16:56, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >>> This patch adds support for the qemu-img check command. It also >>> introduces a dirty bit in the qed header to mark modified images as >>> needi

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] qed: Consistency check support

2010-10-28 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 22.10.2010 16:56, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi: >> This patch adds support for the qemu-img check command.  It also >> introduces a dirty bit in the qed header to mark modified images as >> needing a check.  This bit is cleared when the image file