On 06/17/2010 11:45 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:34:00 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:04 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:24:59 +0200
Juan Quintela wrot
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:04 +0200
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:24:59 +0200
>> > Juan Quintela wrote:
>>
>> >> >
>> >> > I still don't see the need for MIGRATION_STARTED, it could be useful in
>> >> > the target but I'
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:34:00 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:04 +0200
> > Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> >> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:24:59 +0200
> >> > Juan Quintela wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I still don't see t
On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:10:04 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:24:59 +0200
> > Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> >> >
> >> > I still don't see the need for MIGRATION_STARTED, it could be useful in
> >> > the target but I'd like to understand the use case in
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:24:59 +0200
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>> >
>> > I still don't see the need for MIGRATION_STARTED, it could be useful in
>> > the target but I'd like to understand the use case in more detail.
>>
>> At this point, if you are doing migration with tcp,
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:24:59 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:30:57 +0200
> > Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> >> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> > On 06/14/2010 02:54 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> >> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >>
> >> >>> What makes migrati
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:30:57 +0200
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> > On 06/14/2010 02:54 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> >> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> >>> What makes migration important and not savevm?
>> >>>
>> >> That is the reason why I ins
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 12:30:57 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 06/14/2010 02:54 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> >>> What makes migration important and not savevm?
> >>>
> >> That is the reason why I insist to have the events "both" in sou
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 02:54 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> What makes migration important and not savevm?
>>>
>> That is the reason why I insist to have the events "both" in source and
>> destination. About how to integrate savevm on the whole pict
On 06/14/2010 02:54 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/14/2010 01:35 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Ok. lets stop here. My definitions:
Event: this important thing happened (important has several meanings).
Migration events fully enter in this definition. Further
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 01:35 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Ok. lets stop here. My definitions:
>>
>> Event: this important thing happened (important has several meanings).
>>
>> Migration events fully enter in this definition. Furthermore, migration
>> events happens from actions
On 06/14/2010 01:35 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/14/2010 11:02 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/12/2010 06:05 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Luiz Capitulinowrote:
The monitor that did it knows
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 11:02 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 06/12/2010 06:05 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>>
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>
The monitor that did it knows it, nobody else knows it. At destination
tim
On 06/14/2010 11:02 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/12/2010 06:05 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
The monitor that did it knows it, nobody else knows it. At destination
time, I guess you agree this is important, i.e. the managemen
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/12/2010 06:05 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> The monitor that did it knows it, nobody else knows it. At destination
>> time, I guess you agree this is important, i.e. the management app knows
>> that migration has started.
>>
>
> Dual mo
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:20:54 +0200
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Both.
>
> What does it report in the source?
That migration has started :) Nothing else, nothing less.
Think again multiple monitors and/or audit.
>> Why can't we just tell them that migration has ended wi
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 09:35:52 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 09:24 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:58:19 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >
> >> For 0.13, we need to focus on introducing the least disruptive change
> >> that addresses the fundamental
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 13:20:54 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:38:42 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> > 1. QMP only returns the response when the command is finished, eg:
> >> >
> >> > C: { "execute": "migrate", "id": "foo" ... }
> >>
On 06/14/2010 09:24 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:58:19 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
For 0.13, we need to focus on introducing the least disruptive change
that addresses the fundamental requirement--allow clients to avoid a
polling loop for determining when migration en
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:58:19 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> For 0.13, we need to focus on introducing the least disruptive change
> that addresses the fundamental requirement--allow clients to avoid a
> polling loop for determining when migration ends. Having a single event
> with no payload
On 06/12/2010 06:05 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:44:55 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:10:53 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
On 06/12/2010 06:14 AM, Juan Quintela wrote:
Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 06/11/2010 09:30 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:44:55 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
I think we've more or less agreed that MIGRATION_CONNECTED is really
the event we want.
Thi
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:38:42 -0500
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> > 1. QMP only returns the response when the command is finished, eg:
>> >
>> > C: { "execute": "migrate", "id": "foo" ... }
>> > /* nothing is returned, other commands are issued, after several
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 09:30 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:44:55 +0200
>> Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> I think we've more or less agreed that MIGRATION_CONNECTED is really
> the event we want.
This had the problem of migrating to a file/whatever.
MIGRATION_CO
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:44:55 +0200
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:10:53 +0200
>> > Juan Quintela wrote:
>> >
>> >> This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
>> >> Migration events would be there for 0.13 unti
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:38:42 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > 1. QMP only returns the response when the command is finished, eg:
> >
> > C: { "execute": "migrate", "id": "foo" ... }
> > /* nothing is returned, other commands are issued, after several
> > hours... */
> > S: { "re
On 06/11/2010 09:30 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:44:55 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:10:53 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
Migration events would be there f
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:44:55 +0200
Juan Quintela wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:10:53 +0200
> > Juan Quintela wrote:
> >
> >> This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
> >> Migration events would be there for 0.13 until we get proper
> >> async command
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:10:53 +0200
> Juan Quintela wrote:
>
>> This is a resent with what we agreed on yesterday call.
>> Migration events would be there for 0.13 until we get proper
>> async command support.
>
> Something which is not clear to me is the set of events we
2010/6/10 Juan Quintela :
> Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
>> Hi Juan,
>>
>
>> I don't know I have addressed the problem correctly, but here is my
>> try to get "info migrate" on incoming side.
>>
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-06/msg00417.html
>
> I saw it, haven't had the time to l
Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> I don't know I have addressed the problem correctly, but here is my
> try to get "info migrate" on incoming side.
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-06/msg00417.html
I saw it, haven't had the time to look at it yet.
> Apart from that I ha
31 matches
Mail list logo