Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/03/2010 10:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> This attempt to make vmport KVM compatible is half-broken and is
>> scheduled to be replaced by proper upstream support.
>>
>
> Does "scheduled" mean you have patches for adding
> cpu_synchronize_state() to vmport?
See patch 2 i
On 02/03/2010 10:53 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
This attempt to make vmport KVM compatible is half-broken and is
scheduled to be replaced by proper upstream support.
Does "scheduled" mean you have patches for adding
cpu_synchronize_state() to vmport?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many ar
