"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>> It makes my vmstate work more complex, because this is the only user
>> that calls a vvnmstat* and uses _nothing_ of it.
>>
>> rest of users are something like:
>>
>> VMSTATE(, test_function);
>>
>> on the caller side. As virtio already needs to know msix us
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:40:36PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrot
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:51:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:59:03AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:51:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> >> We already do the test for
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:51:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> >> We already do the test for msix on the caller, just use that test
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Juan
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:26:10AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:51:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> >> We already do the test for msix on the caller, just use that test
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
> >
> > NAK
> >
> > I thin
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:51:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> We already do the test for msix on the caller, just use that test
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
>
> NAK
>
> I think we are better off not making assumptions
> about caller behaviour in msix.c, vi
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 07:51:22PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> We already do the test for msix on the caller, just use that test
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela
NAK
I think we are better off not making assumptions
about caller behaviour in msix.c, virtio
will not be the only user forever.
>
