On 04/27/2010 03:20 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:52:29 +0200 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 04/26/2010 09:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
+qemu_system_exit_request();
Untested suggestion: why add qemu_system_exit_request, exit_requested,
and a hook in the main loop? You can
On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 13:52:29 +0200
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 09:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > +qemu_system_exit_request();
>
> Untested suggestion: why add qemu_system_exit_request, exit_requested,
> and a hook in the main loop? You can do instead
>
> no_shutdown = 0;
>
On 04/26/2010 09:44 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
+qemu_system_exit_request();
Untested suggestion: why add qemu_system_exit_request, exit_requested,
and a hook in the main loop? You can do instead
no_shutdown = 0;
qemu_system_shutdown_request();
which will actually call quit_timers
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:13:40 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > Just suspend the monitor before leaving for termination. That should
> > have both the proper visual and functional effect.
> >
>
> Very good idea.
Yeah, works great.
Final versi
On 04/26/2010 02:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Just suspend the monitor before leaving for termination. That should
have both the proper visual and functional effect.
Very good idea.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Jan
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 04/26/2010 01:53 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 13:25:38 -0500
>> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 04/26/2010 01:22 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:49:40 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
