On 12/06/10 10:37, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 06.12.2010 09:02, schrieb Jes Sorensen:
>> On 12/03/10 13:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> There is a perfectly logical explanation for that. Doing that would
>> require for me to have clue, which is a bit much to expect :)
>>
>> That said, we should really do the
Am 06.12.2010 09:02, schrieb Jes Sorensen:
> On 12/03/10 13:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 02.12.2010 18:46, schrieb jes.soren...@redhat.com:
>>> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
>>> index d0dc445..f2e1c94 100644
>>> --- a/qemu-img.c
>>> +++ b/qemu-img.c
>>> @@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static int img_cre
On 12/03/10 13:30, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 02.12.2010 18:46, schrieb jes.soren...@redhat.com:
>> diff --git a/qemu-img.c b/qemu-img.c
>> index d0dc445..f2e1c94 100644
>> --- a/qemu-img.c
>> +++ b/qemu-img.c
>> @@ -304,6 +304,12 @@ static int img_create(int argc, char **argv)
>> flags = 0;
>>
Am 02.12.2010 18:46, schrieb jes.soren...@redhat.com:
> From: Jes Sorensen
>
> This patch changes qemu-img to exit if an unknown option is detected,
> instead of trying to continue with a set of arguments which may be
> incorrect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen
> ---
> qemu-img.c | 48 +
