On Sat, Sep 04, 2010 at 09:01:06AM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:40:58AM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:28:26AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Aug 28, 201
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:40:58AM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:28:26AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:54:53PM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
>> > > PCI d
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 11:40:58AM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:28:26AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:54:53PM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> > > PCI devices should access memory through pci_memory_*() instead of
>
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 08:28:26AM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:54:53PM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> > PCI devices should access memory through pci_memory_*() instead of
> > cpu_physical_memory_*(). This also provides support for translation and
> > acc
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 05:54:53PM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> PCI devices should access memory through pci_memory_*() instead of
> cpu_physical_memory_*(). This also provides support for translation and
> access checking in case an IOMMU is emulated.
>
> Memory maps are treated as r
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 01:08:23AM +0300, Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu wrote:
> PCI devices should access memory through pci_memory_*() instead of
> cpu_physical_memory_*(). This also provides support for translation and
> access checking in case an IOMMU is emulated.
>
> Memory maps are treated as r
