Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/01/2010 12:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Oh, it's indeed a local issue. Likely our corporate mail server. Nice...
>> Sorry for the noise!
>>
>
> Jan, I believe you're okay with the current state of this series, yes?
Yes, of course!
>
> I'd like to apply these AS
On 06/01/2010 12:39 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Oh, it's indeed a local issue. Likely our corporate mail server. Nice...
Sorry for the noise!
Jan, I believe you're okay with the current state of this series, yes?
I'd like to apply these ASAP so we can start formal spec review.
Regards,
Anthon
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:10:26 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>>
>>> One of the most important missing feature in QMP today is its
>>> supported commands documentation.
>>>
>>> The plan is to make it part of self-description sup
On Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:10:26 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > From: Jan Kiszka
> >
> > One of the most important missing feature in QMP today is its
> > supported commands documentation.
> >
> > The plan is to make it part of self-description support, however
> > self-descr
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> One of the most important missing feature in QMP today is its
> supported commands documentation.
>
> The plan is to make it part of self-description support, however
> self-description is a big task we have been postponing for a
> long time now and
On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:50:56 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:30:43 +0200
> > Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> I didn't submit the syntax checking bits on purpose, there's something
> >>> failing there and I
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:30:43 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I didn't submit the syntax checking bits on purpose, there's something
>>> failing there and I didn't want to check it now.
>> You already did for QMP, just skipped the S
On Wed, 19 May 2010 15:30:43 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
[...]
> > I didn't submit the syntax checking bits on purpose, there's something
> > failing there and I didn't want to check it now.
>
> You already did for QMP, just skipped the STEXI/ETEXI balancing checks.
> And
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:15:16 +0200
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
>> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>>
>>> One of the most important missing feature in QMP today is its
>>> supported commands documentation.
>>>
>>> The plan is to make it part of self-description sup
On Wed, 19 May 2010 11:15:16 +0200
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > From: Jan Kiszka
> >
> > One of the most important missing feature in QMP today is its
> > supported commands documentation.
> >
> > The plan is to make it part of self-description support, however
> > self-descr
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> One of the most important missing feature in QMP today is its
> supported commands documentation.
>
> The plan is to make it part of self-description support, however
> self-description is a big task we have been postponing for a
> long time now and
11 matches
Mail list logo
