On 2011-03-11 22:34, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:12:50PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
@@ -956,7 +956,6 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
abort();
}
-ret = 0; /* exit loop */
switch (run->exit_reason) {
>>>
>
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 07:12:50PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> @@ -956,7 +956,6 @@ int kvm_cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
> >> abort();
> >> }
> >>
> >> -ret = 0; /* exit loop */
> >> switch (run->exit_reason) {
> >
> > Better keep ret assignment here so default
On 2011-03-05 17:05, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:20:08AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Let kvm_cpu_exec return EXCP_* values consistently and generate those
>> codes already inside its inner loop. This means we will now re-enter the
>> kernel while ret == 0.
>>
>> Update kvm_h
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:20:08AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Let kvm_cpu_exec return EXCP_* values consistently and generate those
> codes already inside its inner loop. This means we will now re-enter the
> kernel while ret == 0.
>
> Update kvm_handle_internal_error accordingly, but keep
> kvm_a
