On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 01:00:39AM +0100, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > >
> > >> +#ifdef __ia64
> > >> +sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, (sigset_t *)&uc->uc_sigmask, NULL);
> > >> +#else
> > >> sigprocmas
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >> +#ifdef __ia64
> >> +sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, (sigset_t *)&uc->uc_sigmask, NULL);
> >> +#else
> >> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,&uc->uc_sigmask, NULL);
> >> +#endif
> >
> > Any reason for th
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:36:50AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>> +#ifdef __ia64
>> +sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, (sigset_t *)&uc->uc_sigmask, NULL);
>> +#else
>> sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,&uc->uc_sigmask, NULL);
>> +#endif
>
> Any reason for the ifdef?
>
It is not strictly needed, a
+#ifdef __ia64
+sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, (sigset_t *)&uc->uc_sigmask, NULL);
+#else
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,&uc->uc_sigmask, NULL);
+#endif
Any reason for the ifdef?
Paolo