On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 07:37:54PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:06:32PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> >> The signedness of enum types depend on the compiler implementation.
> >> Therefore the check for negative val
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:06:32PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
>> The signedness of enum types depend on the compiler implementation.
>> Therefore the check for negative values may or may not be meaningful.
>>
>> Fix by explicitly casting to
On Sun, Sep 05, 2010 at 03:06:32PM +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> The signedness of enum types depend on the compiler implementation.
> Therefore the check for negative values may or may not be meaningful.
>
> Fix by explicitly casting to a signed integer.
>
> Since the values are also checked earlie
