On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:07:50AM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Do you really find it easier to read evaluations grouped with || ? I
> > don't.
>
> I do, specifically as the old version was even more confusing in that
> important detail "return 0" vs. "return 1". But even the new benefits
> from t
On 2011-02-08 19:50, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:19:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Avoid duplicate use of the function name cpu_has_work, it's confusing.
>> Refactor cpu_has_work to cpu_is_idle and do the same with
>> any_cpu_has_work.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>> -
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:19:13PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Avoid duplicate use of the function name cpu_has_work, it's confusing.
> Refactor cpu_has_work to cpu_is_idle and do the same with
> any_cpu_has_work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
> ---
> cpus.c | 43 +++
