On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
>> they are replacing files in revision control.
> ... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
> in revision control since the
On 01/08/2010 01:31 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
they are replacing files in revision control.
... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and
multiboot.bin) in revision
> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
> they are replacing files in revision control.
... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
in revision control since they do not require any strange tool to be built.
>>> They req
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 01/08/2010 08:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
>>> On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
they are replacing files in revision control.
>>> ... the next quest
On 01/08/2010 08:57 AM, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
they are replacing files in revision control.
... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and mu
Paolo Bonzini a écrit :
> On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
>> they are replacing files in revision control.
>
> ... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
> in revision control sin
On 01/07/2010 09:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This will wreak havoc on the tree since these are built by default and
they are replacing files in revision control.
... the next question is why are they (linuxboot.bin and multiboot.bin)
in revision control since they do not require any strange
On 12/24/2009 04:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Wow, I wonder how it worked for me...
Got it. The option roms are built in pc-bios/optionrom, but QEMU loads
the ones in pc-bios. So actually I was always testing Alexander's code
even though I had done a "make -B" to feel safer. :-(
H
On 12/24/2009 04:27 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Got it. The option roms are built in pc-bios/optionrom, but QEMU loads
the ones in pc-bios. So actually I was always testing Alexander's code
even though I had done a "make -B" to feel safer. :-(
Ah. When things work straight off for me I al
