Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 07/28/2010 02:51 PM, TeLeMan wrote:
> Even if they are mandatory, subsections still improve the situation
> here, because they provide a clean way to "branch" off an upstream
> vmstate version. At least the failure will be clear, because an
> unsupported subsection is e
On 07/28/2010 02:51 PM, TeLeMan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 20:32, Juan Quintela wrote:
TeLeMan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:51, Juan Quintela wrote:
I hope this hepls to understand how subsections are supposed to work.
Thanks for the comments, Juan.
I see, thanks a lot. But I st
--
SUN OF A BEACH
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 20:32, Juan Quintela wrote:
> TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:51, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> I hope this hepls to understand how subsections are supposed to work.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the comments, Juan.
>>>
>> I see, thanks a lot. But I stil
TeLeMan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:51, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> I hope this hepls to understand how subsections are supposed to work.
>>
>> Thanks for the comments, Juan.
>>
> I see, thanks a lot. But I still hope to have the similar subsection
> that can be ignored simply.
Then it is be
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 19:51, Juan Quintela wrote:
> TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:43, Juan Quintela wrote:
>>> TeLeMan wrote:
If the new version adds the new subsection for some vmstate, the old
version will load the new version's vmstate unsuccessfully. So we have
>
TeLeMan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:43, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> TeLeMan wrote:
>>> If the new version adds the new subsection for some vmstate, the old
>>> version will load the new version's vmstate unsuccessfully. So we have
>>> to ignore the unrecognized subsections.
>>
>> No. That
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 18:43, Juan Quintela wrote:
> TeLeMan wrote:
>> If the new version adds the new subsection for some vmstate, the old
>> version will load the new version's vmstate unsuccessfully. So we have
>> to ignore the unrecognized subsections.
>
> No. That was the whole point of s
TeLeMan wrote:
> If the new version adds the new subsection for some vmstate, the old
> version will load the new version's vmstate unsuccessfully. So we have
> to ignore the unrecognized subsections.
No. That was the whole point of subsections. If one subsection is
sent, target machine has to
