On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:04:05AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> I was considering not using bdrv_set_removable() and instead adding a
>> hint to the BlockDriverState which gets checked when constructing the
>> SCSI INQUIRY response.
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:04:05AM +, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> I was considering not using bdrv_set_removable() and instead adding a
> hint to the BlockDriverState which gets checked when constructing the
> SCSI INQUIRY response. If we take that approach, then QEMU doesn't
> consider the block
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:21:26AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The actual removable bit looks fine, but I don't think the connection of
> the change callback looks sane. What's the rationale for it?
Since we're using bdrv_set_removable(), the user may try to eject the
block device from the
The actual removable bit looks fine, but I don't think the connection of
the change callback looks sane. What's the rationale for it?
