On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> 2010/5/22 Blue Swirl :
>> Thanks, applied. You forgot SoB-line, I copied it from the previous version.
>
> Sorry. Btw, is there a way to tell 'format-patch' to always include it?
> Can't find it in the git docs. Otherwise I'll define an al
2010/5/22 Blue Swirl :
> Thanks, applied. You forgot SoB-line, I copied it from the previous version.
Sorry. Btw, is there a way to tell 'format-patch' to always include it?
Can't find it in the git docs. Otherwise I'll define an alias so I won't
need to remember about the '-s' switch.
> On Sat,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:32 AM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> 2010/5/22 Blue Swirl :
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
>> wrote:
>>> On a real hardware changing read-only bits has no effect
>>> Use a mask common for SCSI and Ethernet registers. The crucial
>>> bit is DMA_INTR, bec
Thanks, applied. You forgot SoB-line, I copied it from the previous version.
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> On a real hardware changing read-only bits has no effect
> Use a mask common for SCSI and Ethernet registers. The crucial
> bit is DMA_INTR, because setting or c
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
wrote:
> On a real hardware changing read-only bits has no effect
> Use a mask common for SCSI and Ethernet registers. The crucial
> bit is DMA_INTR, because setting or clearing it may produce
> spurious interrupts.
>
> This patch allows booting So
2010/5/22 Blue Swirl :
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Artyom Tarasenko
> wrote:
>> On a real hardware changing read-only bits has no effect
>> Use a mask common for SCSI and Ethernet registers. The crucial
>> bit is DMA_INTR, because setting or clearing it may produce
>> spurious interrupts.
>
