On Feb 21, 2011, at 9:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 02/21/2011 07:42 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> Mostly a style issue. It is common to always protect header files
>> against multiple inclusion, unless the header is meant to be included
>> several times (which is not the case for these confi
On 02/21/2011 07:42 AM, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Mostly a style issue. It is common to always protect header files
against multiple inclusion, unless the header is meant to be included
several times (which is not the case for these config files). I
think this is a good practice.
Traditionally,
