On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 09:36:55AM +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Well, my question was not if they are sub-modules of raw-posix - they
> clearly are - but rather if they should be.
linux-aio is just a trvial wrapper for the native Linux AIO abi to be
used by QEMU, I can't see why it wouldn't. posix-
Am 25.10.2009 08:19, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:05:55AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Yes, it might look like overkill to introduce a abstraction for exactly
>> two backends. I felt the same way. But then, the current implementation
>> just feels totally wrong. It absolut
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:05:55AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Yes, it might look like overkill to introduce a abstraction for exactly
> two backends. I felt the same way. But then, the current implementation
> just feels totally wrong. It absolutely intransparent when we fall back
> to paio, and be
Am 22.10.2009 10:31, schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:12:55PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> On that note, falling back to POSIX AIO means that paio_submit is called
>> with a Linux AIO aio_ctx. Which works because this parameter is unused
>> anyway, but am I the only one to fin
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:12:55PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> On that note, falling back to POSIX AIO means that paio_submit is called
> with a Linux AIO aio_ctx. Which works because this parameter is unused
> anyway, but am I the only one to find this ugly?
>
> What is the public interface of pai
Am 20.10.2009 11:33, schrieb Kevin Wolf:
> When using Linux AIO raw still falls back to POSIX AIO sometimes, so we should
> initialize it.
>
> Not initializing it happens to work if POSIX AIO is used by another drive, or
> if the format is not specified (probing the format uses POSIX AIO) or by pu
