On 06/14/2010 07:31 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Michal Novotny wrote:
On 06/14/2010 07:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
lsi_bad_phase has a bug in the choice of pmjad1/pmjad2. This does
not matter with Linux guests because it uses just one routine for
both, but it br
On 06/14/2010 07:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
lsi_bad_phase has a bug in the choice of pmjad1/pmjad2. This does
not matter with Linux guests because it uses just one routine for
both, but it breaks Windows 64-bit guests. This is the text
from the spec:
"[The PMJCTL] b
Michal Novotny wrote:
> On 06/14/2010 07:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>> lsi_bad_phase has a bug in the choice of pmjad1/pmjad2. This does
>>> not matter with Linux guests because it uses just one routine for
>>> both, but it breaks Windows 64-bit guests. This is the t
On 06/14/2010 07:05 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
lsi_bad_phase has a bug in the choice of pmjad1/pmjad2. This does
not matter with Linux guests because it uses just one routine for
both, but it breaks Windows 64-bit guests. This is the text
from the spec:
"[The PMJCTL] b
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> lsi_bad_phase has a bug in the choice of pmjad1/pmjad2. This does
> not matter with Linux guests because it uses just one routine for
> both, but it breaks Windows 64-bit guests. This is the text
> from the spec:
>
>"[The PMJCTL] bit controls which decision mechanism i
