On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 03:12:56PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > If I can have my pony, your patch is better than current behaviour :)
>
> Feel free to post a v2 that implements your version. :-)
No real need for that, it can also be done as a separate path on top
of this one.
Note that there's a
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> What is known today as bdrv_open2 becomes the new bdrv_open. All remaining
> callers of the old function are converted to the new one. In some places they
> even know the right format, so they should have used bdrv_open2 from the
> beginning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
I w
Am 31.03.2010 15:08, schrieb Juan Quintela:
> Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> What is known today as bdrv_open2 becomes the new bdrv_open. All remaining
>> callers of the old function are converted to the new one. In some places they
>> even know the right format, so they should have used bdrv_open2 from the
Kevin Wolf wrote:
> What is known today as bdrv_open2 becomes the new bdrv_open. All remaining
> callers of the old function are converted to the new one. In some places they
> even know the right format, so they should have used bdrv_open2 from the
> beginning.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf
I w
