On 12/07/2009 02:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
That's a use-case that needs to be thought through. Maybe commit should
attempt to force the lower level to acquire a write lock first?
Yes. This is an argument in favor of a "DWIM" lock option instead of
giving shared/exclusive choice to the u
Now an admin comes along with with libguestfs and attempts to access
the disk containing the GFS volume. libguestfs isn't part of the
cluster but that doesn't matter because you can happily access a GFS
filesystem in standalone mode provided it is not in use by any other
nodes.
We need to stop li
