On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 19:02 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/15/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:59 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > On 10/14/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Here's an updated version of the patch against current CVS.
> > > > This pa
On 10/15/07, Blue Swirl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/15/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:59 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > On 10/14/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Here's an updated version of the patch against current CVS.
> > > > This patc
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 15:59 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/14/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's an updated version of the patch against current CVS.
> > This patches provides reverse-endian, little-endian and big-endian
> > memory accessors, available with and without softmmu. It
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 14:22 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > Here's a new version. The only change is that, for consistency, I did
> > > > add the big-endian and little-endian accessors that were documented in
> > > > cpu-all.h as unimplemented. The implementation is q
J. Mayer wrote:
[snip]
> > > Here's a new version. The only change is that, for consistency, I did
> > > add the big-endian and little-endian accessors that were documented in
> > > cpu-all.h as unimplemented. The implementation is quite trivial, having
> > > native and reverse-endian accessors ava
On 10/14/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's an updated version of the patch against current CVS.
> This patches provides reverse-endian, little-endian and big-endian
> memory accessors, available with and without softmmu. It also provides
> an IO_MEM_REVERSE TLB flag to allow future s
On Sun, 2007-10-14 at 11:19 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/14/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:17 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:07 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > > On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 2007-1
On 10/14/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:17 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:07 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 13:47 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > > > On 10/13/07, J
J. Mayer wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:17 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 16:07 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 13:47 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > > > On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-13 at 13:47 +0300, Blue Swirl wrote:
> > On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The problem:
> > > some CPU architectures, namely PowerPC and maybe others, offers
> > > facilities to access the memory or I/O in the r
Blue Swirl wrote:
> On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem:
> > some CPU architectures, namely PowerPC and maybe others, offers
> > facilities to access the memory or I/O in the reverse endianness, ie
> > little-endian instead of big-endian for PowerPC, or provide instruct
On 10/13/07, J. Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem:
> some CPU architectures, namely PowerPC and maybe others, offers
> facilities to access the memory or I/O in the reverse endianness, ie
> little-endian instead of big-endian for PowerPC, or provide instruction
> to make memory accesse
12 matches
Mail list logo
