J. Mayer wrote:
[snip]
> > > > > Other than that it looks good to me (and reminds me to check what the
> > > > > supervisor mode on MIPS actually does now :-).
> > > >
> > > > This updated patch gives the opportunity to define a per-target semantic
> > > > of the mmu_idx... Time to check what it m
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:01 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 14:09 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:06 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:12 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > J. Mayer wrote:
> > > > > Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index
On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 18:46 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:06 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:12 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > > J. Mayer wrote:
> > > > > Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function
> >
J. Mayer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 07:06 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 01:12 +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > > J. Mayer wrote:
> > > > Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function in
> > > > targets cpu.h header.
> > > > The idea of this patch is:
>
J. Mayer wrote:
> Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function in
> targets cpu.h header.
> The idea of this patch is:
> - avoid many #ifdef TARGET_xxx in exec-all.h and softmmu_header.h then
> make the code more readable
> - avoid multiple implementation of the same code
Here's a proposal to add a int cpu_mem_index (CPUState *env) function in
targets cpu.h header.
The idea of this patch is:
- avoid many #ifdef TARGET_xxx in exec-all.h and softmmu_header.h then
make the code more readable
- avoid multiple implementation of the same code (3, in that particular
case)
