Stefan,
--On 24 July 2013 09:54:39 +0200 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
I left this how it was in the end (I think), and got round it by
creating a bogus pipe for the test to listen to.
Doing that requires the changes in my patch series, otherwise you break
aio_poll() loops that are waiting for pend
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> --On 23 July 2013 14:18:25 +0200 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >Unfortunately there is an issue with the series which I haven't had time
> >to look into yet. I don't remember the details but I think make check
> >is failing.
> >
> >The curr
Stefan,
--On 23 July 2013 14:18:25 +0200 Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
Secondly, the tests I am writing for the timer fail because g_poll is
not called, because busy is false. This is because I haven't got an
fd set up. But in the instance where aio_poll is called with
blocking=true and there are no
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 02:14:43PM +0100, Alex Bligh wrote:
> As part of adding timer operations to aio_poll and a clock to AioContext, I
> am trying to figure out a couple of points on how aio_poll works. This
> primarily revolves around the flag busy.
>
> Firstly, at the end of aio_poll, it has
As part of adding timer operations to aio_poll and a clock to AioContext, I
am trying to figure out a couple of points on how aio_poll works. This
primarily revolves around the flag busy.
Firstly, at the end of aio_poll, it has
assert(progress || busy);
This assert in fact checks nothing, be
