"Edgar E. Iglesias" writes:
> But running Debian's 64-bit kernel vmlinux-2.6.32-5-5kc-malta under
> qemu-system-mips64 consumes 100% on the host system, whether the guest
> is idle or busy. (And for qemu-system-mips64el, the same is true for the
> corresponding 64-bit el kernel.)
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:25:43AM +0200, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> Running Debian's vmlinux-2.6.32-5-4kc-malta under qemu-system-mips works
> very well--the system is fast, and when it is idle the qemu-system-mips
> process on the host system consumes insignificant CPU. (The same is
> true for q
Andreas Färber writes:
Am 28.09.2011 02:25, schrieb Torbjorn Granlund:
> Another issue I ran into what the sh4 qemu performance. It is much
> worse than other qemu ports (except perhaps ppc64). What is the reason
> behind that? (The idle thing works well for sh4, though.)
>
> My ho
Am 28.09.2011 02:25, schrieb Torbjorn Granlund:
> Another issue I ran into what the sh4 qemu performance. It is much
> worse than other qemu ports (except perhaps ppc64). What is the reason
> behind that? (The idle thing works well for sh4, though.)
>
> My host system runs FreeBSD 8.2. The Debi
Running Debian's vmlinux-2.6.32-5-4kc-malta under qemu-system-mips works
very well--the system is fast, and when it is idle the qemu-system-mips
process on the host system consumes insignificant CPU. (The same is
true for qemu-system-mipsel, using the correesponding 'el' Debian
kernel.)
But runni
