On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 03/05/2012 04:53 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> On 02/28/2012 05:46 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> In the current model, only one instance of qemu is running for each
> >>> running
On 03/06/2012 02:22 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Anthony Liguori writes:
My concern is that this moves the Xen use case pretty far from what
the typical QEMU use case would be (running one emulator per guest).
If it was done in a non-invasive way, maybe it would be acceptable but
at a high le
Anthony Liguori writes:
> On 03/05/2012 04:53 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 02/28/2012 05:46 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello,
In the current model, only one instance of qemu is running for each
running HVM
domain.
>
On 03/05/2012 04:53 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 02/28/2012 05:46 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello,
In the current model, only one instance of qemu is running for each running HVM
domain.
We are looking at disaggregating qemu to have, for example, a
On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/28/2012 05:46 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > In the current model, only one instance of qemu is running for each running
> > HVM
> > domain.
> >
> > We are looking at disaggregating qemu to have, for example, an instance to
> > emulate
On 02/28/2012 05:46 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hello,
In the current model, only one instance of qemu is running for each running HVM
domain.
We are looking at disaggregating qemu to have, for example, an instance to
emulate only
network controllers, another to emulate block devices, etc...
Why
Hello,
In the current model, only one instance of qemu is running for each running HVM
domain.
We are looking at disaggregating qemu to have, for example, an instance to
emulate only
network controllers, another to emulate block devices, etc...
Multiple instances of qemu would run for a singl
