On 09/03/2017 18:06, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> (cc'ing in Paolo since he knows our barrier code)
>
> * FENG, Jiasheng (nikof...@connect.hku.hk) wrote:
>> Dear David,
>>
>> Really appreciate your feedback.
>>
>> I have proceeded the experiments in both conditions, and no matter the
>> vCPUs
@nongnu.org; Wang Cheng; YE, Chen; CHEN, XUSHENG; Heming Cui;
pbonz...@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU MicroCheckpointing Pause & Resume Latency
(cc'ing in Paolo since he knows our barrier code)
* FENG, Jiasheng (nikof...@connect.hku.hk) wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> Really apprec
(cc'ing in Paolo since he knows our barrier code)
* FENG, Jiasheng (nikof...@connect.hku.hk) wrote:
> Dear David,
>
> Really appreciate your feedback.
>
> I have proceeded the experiments in both conditions, and no matter the
> vCPUs are in idle or busy situation, there is no difference that smp
Dear David,
Really appreciate your feedback.
I have proceeded the experiments in both conditions, and no matter the
vCPUs are in idle or busy situation, there is no difference that smp_wmb()
will consume a lot of time to proceed its work.
In your opinion, may I know that what is the alternative
* FENG, Jiasheng (nikof...@connect.hku.hk) wrote:
> Dear QEMU Development Team,
>
>
> It is my honor to contact with you.
>
>
>
> I am a postgraduate student from University of Hong Kong. Currently I am
> working on a project related to QEMU MicroCheckpointing and I have
> encountered a perfor
Dear QEMU Development Team,
It is my honor to contact with you.
I am a postgraduate student from University of Hong Kong. Currently I am
working on a project related to QEMU MicroCheckpointing and I have
encountered a performance issue during checkpoint pause & resume.
Please kindly refer t
