I'll tag and push a tarball right now.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 March 2014 17:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 11 February 2014 14:34, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> Looks reasonable to me. I'll handle the release logistics in terms of
On 13 March 2014 17:24, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 February 2014 14:34, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Looks reasonable to me. I'll handle the release logistics in terms of
>> tarball releases and tagging.
>
> Ping! Yesterday was nominally rc0 tagging day (though there
> was a bunch of late-breakin
On 11 February 2014 14:34, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Looks reasonable to me. I'll handle the release logistics in terms of
> tarball releases and tagging.
Ping! Yesterday was nominally rc0 tagging day (though there
was a bunch of late-breaking stuff so just as well we didn't
tag then in some ways
Looks reasonable to me. I'll handle the release logistics in terms of
tarball releases and tagging.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> It's time to agree on the QEMU 2.0 release schedule so we can make a
> release within the next 2-3 months.
>
>
It's time to agree on the QEMU 2.0 release schedule so we can make a
release within the next 2-3 months.
The following proposal is the output of IRC discussion. Juan figured
out the dates and got feedback from several of us. Speak up if you
have concerns about the dates.
Anthony: Please confirm
