On 12 January 2015 at 15:31, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Eric Blake writes:
>> On 12/23/2014 08:50 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Although you could argue that we don't care about differences
>>> in C and C++ semantics, having a zero-sized struct floating
>>> around seems a bit risky to me, since fo
Eric Blake writes:
> On 12/23/2014 08:50 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> In qapi-schema.json we have a couple of entries that define
>> empty structures, like this:
>>
>> { 'type': 'ChardevDummy', 'data': { } }
>>
>> In the generated qapi-types.h these are turned into empty C structs:
>>
>
>> Alth
On 12/23/2014 08:50 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In qapi-schema.json we have a couple of entries that define
> empty structures, like this:
>
> { 'type': 'ChardevDummy', 'data': { } }
>
> In the generated qapi-types.h these are turned into empty C structs:
>
> Although you could argue that we don
In qapi-schema.json we have a couple of entries that define
empty structures, like this:
{ 'type': 'ChardevDummy', 'data': { } }
In the generated qapi-types.h these are turned into empty C structs:
struct ChardevDummy
{
};
and clang warns about them:
./qapi-types.h:3752:1: warning: empty struct
