Il 13/06/2012 10:43, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>> > It's quite possible that interfaces are borked, since we have no unit
>> > tests and no user. :/
> Alrighty,
>
> So if this is the first user, then maybe its the smoke-test case?
> Preparing a test package now.
Yes, having a user was in fact
Up and running Paolo,
Interfaces now tested as working in a machine :)
I had to hack-up QOM a little bit for it all to work, creating a
series (hacks and all) so it can be discussed.
Regards,
Peter
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 13/06/2012 08:21, Peter Crosthwaite h
Il 13/06/2012 08:21, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
>
> Im testing your revisions the the xilinx ip around getting rid of the
> pointer props (your prop-ptr branch on your github).
>
> First up theres a typo in the machine model stuff, heres the fix:
>
> diff --git a/hw/petalogix_ml605_mmu.c b/hw
Hi Paolo,
Im testing your revisions the the xilinx ip around getting rid of the
pointer props (your prop-ptr branch on your github).
First up theres a typo in the machine model stuff, heres the fix:
diff --git a/hw/petalogix_ml605_mmu.c b/hw/petalogix_ml605_mmu.c
index 37866f4..e718183 100644
--
