On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 17:47:25 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:08:54 -0500
> > Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >
> >> Luiz Capitulino writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300
> >> > Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Thu, 26 Jul
Il 26/07/2012 20:22, anth...@codemonkey.ws ha scritto:
> 7. We need to make sure that anything we expose in 1.2 stays that way.
>If we're dropping 'InvalidParameterType' as a class code, it should be
>dropped in 1.2. This could be achieved by making all existing codes
>except for those
Il 26/07/2012 22:41, Eric Blake ha scritto:
>> > 5. The following errors are used by libvirt:
>> >- CommandNotFound: QMP parsing
>> >- DeviceNotActive/KVMMissingCap: ballooning
>> >- DeviceNotFound: drive_del
>> >- MigrationExpected: cont
> DeviceInUse, NotSupported: block-stream
>
anth...@codemonkey.ws writes:
> Hi,
>
> We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward
> with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This
> note attempts to outline that.
>
> Principles
> --
> 1. Errors should be free formed strings with a class
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:08:54 -0500
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>>
>> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300
>> > Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500
>> >> anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:22:15PM -0500, anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
> We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward
> with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This
> note attempts to outline that.
>
> Principles
> --
> 1. Errors should be
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 16:08:54 -0500
Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino writes:
>
> > On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300
> > Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500
> >> anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > We had a violent^Wheated
Luiz Capitulino writes:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300
> Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500
>> anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward
>> > with Luiz's proposed error series.
On 07/26/2012 12:22 PM, anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward
> with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This
> note attempts to outline that.
>
> Principles
> --
> 1. Errors should be free
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:43:58 -0300
Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500
> anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward
> > with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This
>
On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 13:22:15 -0500
anth...@codemonkey.ws wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward
> with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This
> note attempts to outline that.
This looks great to me, violent^W heated di
Hi,
We had a violent^Wheated discussion on IRC about how to move forward
with Luiz's proposed error series. I think we reached consensus. This
note attempts to outline that.
Principles
--
1. Errors should be free formed strings with a class code
2. There should be a small number of cl
12 matches
Mail list logo
