Thanks for you thoughts Andreas,
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hello John,
>
> Am 05.04.2012 01:35, schrieb John Williams:
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
>> wrote:
>>
>>> We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353 device model in our tree that
>>> w
Hello John,
Am 05.04.2012 01:35, schrieb John Williams:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
> wrote:
>
>> We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353 device model in our tree that
>> we wish to refactor and ultimately push to mainline. Before I go about
>> reworking it, I wish to d
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Peter Crosthwaite
wrote:
> We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353 device model in our tree that
> we wish to refactor and ultimately push to mainline. Before I go about
> reworking it, I wish to discuss the architecture of this device model
> because its non-tri
Hi Everyone,
We currently have a somewhat hacky PL353 device model in our tree that
we wish to refactor and ultimately push to mainline. Before I go about
reworking it, I wish to discuss the architecture of this device model
because its non-trivial. The pl353 is sysbus slave that is a combined
NAN
