Rob Landley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 10:25 am, Ben Taylor wrote:
> > However, it's very wax-on, wax-off kind of thing. Without the patch,
> > arm-test and mips-test crash. With the patch, I can run both tests.
>
> Could we get a reproduction sequence for the c
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 10:25 am, Ben Taylor wrote:
> However, it's very wax-on, wax-off kind of thing. Without the patch,
> arm-test and mips-test crash. With the patch, I can run both tests.
Could we get a reproduction sequence for the crashes please?
Rob
--
Vista: Windows Millenium Second
> However, it's very wax-on, wax-off kind of thing. Without the patch,
> arm-test and mips-test crash. With the patch, I can run both tests.
As I've said before it's not sufficient to say that a patch fixes a bug, you
have to explain *what* bug you are fixing, *how* it fixes the bug, and *why*
Paul Brook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2007 14:01, Ben Taylor wrote:
> > This patch fixes crashes when testing with arm-test-0.2.tar.gz and
> > mips-test-0.2.tar.gz. Without the patch, both arm-test and mips-test
> > segfault when trying to boot.
>
> I don't believe thi
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 14:01, Ben Taylor wrote:
> This patch fixes crashes when testing with arm-test-0.2.tar.gz and
> mips-test-0.2.tar.gz. Without the patch, both arm-test and mips-test
> segfault when trying to boot.
I don't believe this is correct. You're going to have to come up with a fair
This patch fixes crashes when testing with arm-test-0.2.tar.gz and
mips-test-0.2.tar.gz.
Without the patch, both arm-test and mips-test segfault when trying to boot.
The original patch was authored by Martin Bochnig.
--- qemu/cpu-exec.c.ORIG 2007-03-13 09:46:51.940624000 -0400
+++ qemu/cpu-exec
