Il 25/02/2013 14:22, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
>> > There have been a handful of contributors to these
>> > files, but they all look to be regular QEMU contributors so I
>> > don't think there would be any objections. Along with the code,
>> > the IASL parsing code and associated bu
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:51:55AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:00:28PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > I did a review of the SeaBIOS code to see what information is
> > currently used to generate the ACPI, SMBIOS, MPTABLE, and PIR bios
> > tables. Here's what I came up
On 02/24/13 19:00, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 04:47:26PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 11:38 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
>>> IMO, we need to move the ACPI table creation (and PIR/MPTABLE/SMBIOS)
>>> to QEMU and just have QEMU pass the tables to SeaBIOS
Il 25/02/2013 09:51, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
> > Of these, the only thing I see that could be problematic is the PCI
> > irq assignments (used in mptable) and the PCI region space (used in
> > ACPI DSDT _SB.PCI.CRS). These are slightly problematic as they
> > currently rely somewhat on the curren
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 01:00:28PM -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 04:47:26PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 11:38 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > > IMO, we need to move the ACPI table creation (and PIR/MPTABLE/SMBIOS)
> > > to QEMU and just have QEM
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 04:47:26PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 11:38 -0500, Kevin O'Connor wrote:
> > IMO, we need to move the ACPI table creation (and PIR/MPTABLE/SMBIOS)
> > to QEMU and just have QEMU pass the tables to SeaBIOS for it to copy
> > into memory like it does
