On 01/29/2012 02:35 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/29/2012 02:06 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >
> > > Blue posted patches for this. s/<=/ > >
> >
> > Err, not. I'll just try Blue's patch.
> >
>
> With a fix, migration doesn't complete. Looking into it.
>
Turns out the migration problems are unrelat
On 01/29/2012 02:06 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > Blue posted patches for this. s/<=/ >
>
> Err, not. I'll just try Blue's patch.
>
With a fix, migration doesn't complete. Looking into it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
On 01/29/2012 02:04 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/29/2012 02:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2012-01-29 13:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 01/29/2012 01:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >> On 2012-01-29 12:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >
> > > 2. Migration is broken.
> >
> > OK, that's new
On 01/29/2012 02:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 13:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/29/2012 01:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> On 2012-01-29 12:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >
> > 2. Migration is broken.
>
> OK, that's new. A trivial scenario?
>
> >>>
> >>> Incoming command
On 2012-01-29 13:01, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/29/2012 01:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-29 12:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
> 2. Migration is broken.
OK, that's new. A trivial scenario?
>>>
>>> Incoming command line:
>>>
>>> qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 /images/Fedora.img -
On 01/29/2012 01:54 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 12:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 2. Migration is broken.
> >>
> >> OK, that's new. A trivial scenario?
> >>
> >
> > Incoming command line:
> >
> > qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 /images/Fedora.img -smp 2 -monitor stdio
> > -incoming tcp::
On 2012-01-29 12:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>>
>>> 2. Migration is broken.
>>
>> OK, that's new. A trivial scenario?
>>
>
> Incoming command line:
>
> qemu-system-x86_64 -m 512 /images/Fedora.img -smp 2 -monitor stdio
> -incoming tcp::
>
> I expect you can remove '-smp 2' and it would still fa
On 2012-01-29 12:18, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/29/2012 01:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-29 12:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 01/29/2012 12:33 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 01/27/2012 11:34 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>> Yes please. It's halfway through autotest and looks good. Even if
On 01/29/2012 01:15 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-29 12:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 01/29/2012 12:33 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 01/27/2012 11:34 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> Yes please. It's halfway through autotest and looks good. Even if I
> have to change it, we can 'git r
On 2012-01-29 12:12, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/29/2012 12:33 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 01/27/2012 11:34 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Yes please. It's halfway through autotest and looks good. Even if I
have to change it, we can 'git rebase -p --onto' your branch (though I
doubt it w
On 01/29/2012 12:33 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/27/2012 11:34 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >
> > > Yes please. It's halfway through autotest and looks good. Even if I
> > > have to change it, we can 'git rebase -p --onto' your branch (though I
> > > doubt it will be necessary).
> >
> > Done, see
On 01/27/2012 11:34 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > Yes please. It's halfway through autotest and looks good. Even if I
> > have to change it, we can 'git rebase -p --onto' your branch (though I
> > doubt it will be necessary).
>
> Done, see
>
> git://git.kiszka.org/qemu-kvm.git queues/qemu-merge
On 2012-01-26 16:49, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 05:45 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>
I merged the upstream patches one by one, resolving the mechanical and
logical conflicts in each step. Was done for that backend/frontend
concept, but the adjustments should basically be the same n
On 01/26/2012 05:45 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> >> I merged the upstream patches one by one, resolving the mechanical and
> >> logical conflicts in each step. Was done for that backend/frontend
> >> concept, but the adjustments should basically be the same now. Want me
> >> to prepare a branch or
On 2012-01-26 16:39, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/26/2012 05:32 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-26 16:25, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-01-26 16:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
The changes to kvm-apic are so drastic, that merging them into qemu-kvm
in the normal way won't work. I can consider jus
On 01/26/2012 05:32 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-26 16:25, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 2012-01-26 16:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> The changes to kvm-apic are so drastic, that merging them into qemu-kvm
> >> in the normal way won't work. I can consider just dropping the existing
> >> implementatio
On 2012-01-26 16:25, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-01-26 16:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> The changes to kvm-apic are so drastic, that merging them into qemu-kvm
>> in the normal way won't work. I can consider just dropping the existing
>> implementation and switching to the new one, but the comment at t
On 2012-01-26 16:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
> The changes to kvm-apic are so drastic, that merging them into qemu-kvm
> in the normal way won't work. I can consider just dropping the existing
> implementation and switching to the new one, but the comment at the end
>
> Make the basic in-kernel irq
The changes to kvm-apic are so drastic, that merging them into qemu-kvm
in the normal way won't work. I can consider just dropping the existing
implementation and switching to the new one, but the comment at the end
Make the basic in-kernel irqchip support selectable via
-machine ...,kern
19 matches
Mail list logo
