>>> On 30.03.15 at 11:49, wrote:
> On 27/03/2015 17:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> And then the way access_with_adjusted_size() works, it looks to
>> me as if with .impl.min_access_size set to greater than 1
>> unaligned accesses could still reach the actual read or write
>> handler, as only the access
On 27/03/2015 17:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to understand what the idea behind these is. For one,
> without .valid.accepts set I can't see the two respective .valid
> fields take effect at all. Yet all examples I looked at don't set
> .valid.accepts. What's the deal here?
Th
Hello,
I'm trying to understand what the idea behind these is. For one,
without .valid.accepts set I can't see the two respective .valid
fields take effect at all. Yet all examples I looked at don't set
.valid.accepts. What's the deal here?
And then the way access_with_adjusted_size() works, it l
