On 25 August 2017 at 10:33, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Fri, 08/25 10:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The problem is that we don't have a good framework for building
>> guest binaries to run under TCG. We should sort out one of those
>> so that it's easy for a new test to say "this is the .c file,
>> build
On Fri, 08/25 10:10, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 25 August 2017 at 06:49, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > On 25.08.2017 00:16, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08/24/2017 05:50 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thank you for the patches. I will test them. I was wondering what is the
> >>> point to having
On 25 August 2017 at 06:49, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 25.08.2017 00:16, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>>
>> On 08/24/2017 05:50 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you for the patches. I will test them. I was wondering what is the
>>> point to having both 'make check' and 'make test'. It looks like everyo
On 25.08.2017 00:16, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
> On 08/24/2017 05:50 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for the patches. I will test them. I was wondering what is the
>> point to having both 'make check' and 'make test'. It looks like everyone is
>> using 'make check'. Maybe we are better off
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 6:21 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/24/2017 06:18 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
>> After applying the patches I saw this error:
>>
>> $ make test
>> make -C tests/tcg test
>> CC test_path.o
>> LINKtest_path
>> ./test_path
>> cc -m32 -nostdlib -Wall -O2 -g -f
On 08/24/2017 06:18 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
> After applying the patches I saw this error:
>
> $ make test
> make -C tests/tcg test
> CC test_path.o
> LINKtest_path
> ./test_path
> cc -m32 -nostdlib -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -static -o hello-i386
> hello-i386.c
> hello-i
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 4:41 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/24/2017 03:10 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
>> I think 'make test' is an abandoned testing option for QEMU so this report
>> might be unimportant. Here is my results for running 'make test':
>>
>> $ make test
>> make -C tests/tcg te
On 08/24/2017 05:50 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
>
> Thank you for the patches. I will test them. I was wondering what is the
> point to having both 'make check' and 'make test'. It looks like everyone is
> using 'make check'. Maybe we are better off removing the 'make test' target.
>
I think t
> On Aug 24, 2017, at 4:41 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
>
>
> On 08/24/2017 03:10 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
>> I think 'make test' is an abandoned testing option for QEMU so this report
>> might be unimportant. Here is my results for running 'make test':
>>
>> $ make test
>> make -C tests/tcg te
On 08/24/2017 03:10 PM, Programmingkid wrote:
> I think 'make test' is an abandoned testing option for QEMU so this report
> might be unimportant. Here is my results for running 'make test':
>
> $ make test
> make -C tests/tcg test
> LINKtest_path
> Undefined symbols for architecture x86_
I think 'make test' is an abandoned testing option for QEMU so this report
might be unimportant. Here is my results for running 'make test':
$ make test
make -C tests/tcg test
LINKtest_path
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"_buffer_is_zero", referenced from:
_qemu_iovec_is
On 11 April 2015 at 21:25, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Similar in spirit to some of those tests, I had been thinking about
> testing linux-user by running host binaries, comparing native and
> emulated output. make check only covers the softmmus today.
Yeah. I run the linux-user-test binaries from ht
Am 11.04.2015 um 17:52 schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 11 April 2015 at 16:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> On Mac OS X, executing qemu-i386 (as opposed to qemu-system-i386) won't
>> work though, as darwin-user is no longer available.
>>
>> Also, the Makefile seems to assume that it's running on x86.
>
>
On 11 April 2015 at 16:46, Andreas Färber wrote:
> On Mac OS X, executing qemu-i386 (as opposed to qemu-system-i386) won't
> work though, as darwin-user is no longer available.
>
> Also, the Makefile seems to assume that it's running on x86.
Yes, it has all sorts of problems. We should probably
s
Am 10.04.2015 um 19:56 schrieb Programmingkid:
> The 'make test' command fails to build on Mac OS X. This is because of a
> missing header file. Here is the error:
>
> include/glib-compat.h:19:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory
> #include
On Linux, this gets me past that point,
On 10 April 2015 at 18:56, Programmingkid wrote:
> The 'make test' command fails to build on Mac OS X. This is because of a
> missing header file. Here is the error:
>
> include/glib-compat.h:19:18: fatal error: glib.h: No such file or directory
> #include
"make test" builds a bunch of unmaint
16 matches
Mail list logo
