On 2/26/06, Tace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,Please do...I got a question, doesn't disable the interrupts changes theunderlying system? Perhaps a good way would be to monitor thecompletion of the interrupt routine before singlestepping to the next
instruction?On 2/23/06, prime <[EMAIL PRO
On 2/25/06, Mulyadi Santosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi..> So I modify> QEMU's source code to disable interrupts in single step mode,and now> I can use "step" or "next" command in gdb to single step> functions.
very interesting! Please post your patch on qemu-devel and preferably onqemu.dad-answ
Hi..
> So I modify
> QEMU's source code to disable interrupts in single step mode,and now
> I can use "step" or "next" command in gdb to single step
> functions.
very interesting! Please post your patch on qemu-devel and preferably on
qemu.dad-answers.com too. Personally, I'd be glad to review
Hello everyone,
I find that I can't single step OS kernels use qemu.When I use "step"
or "next" command in gdb,the kernel always enter its interrupt route
instead of executing the next instruction after the breakpoint.So I modify
QEMU's source code to disable interrupts in single step mode,and
Hello everyone,
I find that I can't single step OS kernels use qemu.When I use "step" or "next" command in gdb,
the kernel always enter its interrupt route instead
of executing the next instruction after the breakpoint.So I
modify QEMU's source code to disable interrupts in single step mode,an
