On Fri. 2010-07-30 14:21:42 +, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:40 PM, amateur wrote:
> > Hi, All
> There's '-d in_asm,op,out_asm' but it may not help much.
Since the program runs a while before fail, that counts a lot of
instructions(hundreds of millions). With this volume of in
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 3:40 PM, amateur wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> I'm trying to run benchmarks from SPEC CPU2006 compiled for SPARC on
> top of qemu-sparc32plus. However, several benchmarks failed to get the
> correct result.
>
> One of the failed benchmarks, 403.gcc, runs for a while and then print
>
Hello
have you tried older versions of qemu, in an attempt to see if this is a
recent problem?
As of about a year ago I had qemu-sparc32plus running most of SPEC2006
properly, validated against hardware perf counters.
gcc definitely worked. I had issues with calculix, dealII, soplex, wrf,
ze
On Thu. 2010-07-29 22:20:28 +0200, Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
> 2010/7/29 amateur :
> > Hi, All
> >
> > I'm trying to run benchmarks from SPEC CPU2006 compiled for SPARC on
> > top of qemu-sparc32plus. However, several benchmarks failed to get the
> > correct result.
>
> Can you try to compile them f
2010/7/29 amateur :
> Hi, All
>
> I'm trying to run benchmarks from SPEC CPU2006 compiled for SPARC on
> top of qemu-sparc32plus. However, several benchmarks failed to get the
> correct result.
Can you try to compile them for sparc32 (no plus)? Are the tests
multi-threaded? If yes, can you try to
Hi, All
I'm trying to run benchmarks from SPEC CPU2006 compiled for SPARC on
top of qemu-sparc32plus. However, several benchmarks failed to get the
correct result.
One of the failed benchmarks, 403.gcc, runs for a while and then print
an error message and exit. However, the same compiled gcc bina
