Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-05 Thread Avi Kivity
On 04/04/2012 05:39 PM, Michael Roth wrote: > > Will command line take in account hot-plugged devices? > > No, that's a good point. We'd probably need to generate the options > required to ensure the devices are created on the target, and we'd only > be able to do that just before sending the devic

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Michael Roth
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 03:21:26PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On 04/04/2012 02:14 PM, Michael Roth wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:53:34PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote: > >>On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote: > >>> > >>>On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, "Paolo Bonzini" >>>

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Igor Mammedov
On 04/04/2012 02:14 PM, Michael Roth wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:53:34PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote: On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote: On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, "Paolo Bonzini"mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com>> wrote: Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: Attacking the IDL/schem

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Michael Roth
On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 01:53:34PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote: > On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote: > > > >On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, "Paolo Bonzini" >> wrote: > > > > > > Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: > > > > Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/04/2012 02:52 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: On 04/04/2012 05:53 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote: On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, "Paolo Bonzini" mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: > > Attacking the IDL/schema side fir

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 04/04/2012 05:53 AM, Dor Laor wrote: On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote: On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, "Paolo Bonzini" mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: > > Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach. From > > ther

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 04/03/2012 03:43 PM, Dor Laor wrote: On 04/03/2012 05:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: I'm afraid my notes are rather rough... * 1.1 soft freeze apr 15th (less than two weeks) hard freeze may 1 three months cycle for 1.2 stable machine types only every few releases? "pc-next" * Maintainers,

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/04/2012 01:37 PM, Michael Roth wrote: On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, "Paolo Bonzini" mailto:pbonz...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: > > Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach. From > > there we can potentially generate ASN.1 B

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Michael Roth
On Apr 4, 2012 2:42 AM, "Paolo Bonzini" wrote: > > Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: > > Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach. From > > there we can potentially generate ASN.1 BER/DER visitors for the protocol > > side, or potentially even just vmstate bin

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-04 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Il 04/04/2012 03:18, Michael Roth ha scritto: > Attacking the IDL/schema side first is the more rationale approach. From > there we can potentially generate ASN.1 BER/DER visitors for the protocol > side, or potentially even just vmstate bindings as a start. I've recently > started looking into the

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-03 Thread Michael Roth
On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 11:43:57PM +0300, Dor Laor wrote: > On 04/03/2012 05:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >I'm afraid my notes are rather rough... > > > >* 1.1 > > soft freeze apr 15th (less than two weeks) > > hard freeze may 1 > > three months cycle for 1.2 > > stable machine types o

Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-03 Thread Dor Laor
On 04/03/2012 05:43 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: I'm afraid my notes are rather rough... * 1.1 soft freeze apr 15th (less than two weeks) hard freeze may 1 three months cycle for 1.2 stable machine types only every few releases? "pc-next" * Maintainers, got distracted and my notes

[Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes April 3

2012-04-03 Thread Markus Armbruster
I'm afraid my notes are rather rough... * 1.1 soft freeze apr 15th (less than two weeks) hard freeze may 1 three months cycle for 1.2 stable machine types only every few releases? "pc-next" * Maintainers, got distracted and my notes make no sense, sorry * MSI injection to KVM irqchips f