On 22 November 2012 21:00, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
> Oh it's simple enough initially, just move the ioctl call from generic
> kvm init to machine init. The problem is then to add an argument, since
> that essentially means changing the ioctl number, but we need that for
> all archs where the
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 11:25 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Again, from memory, you were volunteered to do the initial x86
> change so
> > we could piggy back on it :-) Or do I remember wrong ?
>
> Please suggest an API, then we can work out the x86 changes. I can
> volunteer myself, but I wasn't
Il 21/11/2012 02:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt ha scritto:
> David (CC) want to make some progress with our in-kernel PIC. From
> memory, one of the outcomes of the BOF was that we need to move the
> existing "enable in-kernel PIC" from generic KVM init to machine init in
> order to be able to add an
On 2012-11-21 02:07, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Hi Jan !
>
> David (CC) want to make some progress with our in-kernel PIC. From
> memory, one of the outcomes of the BOF was that we need to move the
> existing "enable in-kernel PIC" from generic KVM init to machine init in
> order to be able t
Hi Jan !
David (CC) want to make some progress with our in-kernel PIC. From
memory, one of the outcomes of the BOF was that we need to move the
existing "enable in-kernel PIC" from generic KVM init to machine init in
order to be able to add an argument indicating the "model" use by the
arch/platfo
