On 04/11/2016 07:18 AM, Eli Britstein wrote:
>
[meta-comment]
> Thanks, Eli
>>
>> --
>> MST
> -
> This email and any files transmitted and/or attachmen
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:m...@redhat.com]
> Sent: Monday, 11 April, 2016 3:28 PM
> To: Markus Armbruster
> Cc: Eli Britstein; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; k...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: IVSHMEM device performance
>
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:56:54AM +0200,
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:56:54AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Cc: qemu-devel
>
> Eli Britstein writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > In a VM, I add a IVSHMEM device, on which the MBUFS mempool resides, and
> > also rings I create (I run a DPDK application in the VM).
> > I saw there is a performance
Cc: qemu-devel
Eli Britstein writes:
> Hi
>
> In a VM, I add a IVSHMEM device, on which the MBUFS mempool resides, and also
> rings I create (I run a DPDK application in the VM).
> I saw there is a performance penalty if I use such device, instead of
> hugepages (the VM's hugepages). My VM's m
