On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger
wrote:
> Btw, I'll likely end up doing this conversion to realize the performance
> benefits when testing with raw flash backends, but I'm more than happy
> to take a patch ahead of that if you have the extra cycles to spare.
This was mention
On 06/14/2012 08:07 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 05:45:22PM +0800, Cong Meng wrote:
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:30 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, mengcong wrote:
seq-readseq-write rand-read rand-write
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 14:27 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 14/06/2012 14:07, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> > Perfect, thanks. virtio-scsi userspace is much better than virtio-blk
> > here. That's unexpected since they both use the QEMU block layer. If
> > anything, I would have expected virtio
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 17:57 +0800, Cong Meng wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 12:08 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:13 +0800, mengcong wrote:
> > > Hi folks, I did an IO performance test on the tcm-vhost scsi. I want to
> > > share
> > > the test result data here.
>
Il 14/06/2012 14:07, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> Perfect, thanks. virtio-scsi userspace is much better than virtio-blk
> here. That's unexpected since they both use the QEMU block layer. If
> anything, I would have expected virtio-blk to be faster!
Yes, I would have expected something similar
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 05:45:22PM +0800, Cong Meng wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:30 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, mengcong wrote:
> > >seq-readseq-write rand-read
> > > rand-write
> > >8k 256k
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 12:08 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:13 +0800, mengcong wrote:
> > Hi folks, I did an IO performance test on the tcm-vhost scsi. I want to
> > share
> > the test result data here.
> >
> >
> > seq-readseq-write
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 09:30 +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, mengcong wrote:
> >seq-readseq-write rand-read rand-write
> >8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k
> > -
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, mengcong wrote:
> seq-read seq-write rand-read rand-write
> 8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k
>
> bare-metal
Hi folks, I did an IO performance test on the tcm-vhost scsi. I want to share
the test result data here.
seq-readseq-write rand-read rand-write
8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k
--
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:13 +0800, mengcong wrote:
> Hi folks, I did an IO performance test on the tcm-vhost scsi. I want to share
> the test result data here.
>
>
> seq-readseq-write rand-read rand-write
> 8k 256k 8k 256k
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, mengcong wrote:
> seq-read seq-write rand-read rand-write
> 8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k 8k 256k
>
> bare-metal
12 matches
Mail list logo
