On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 23:51 +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> The Wednesday 12 Feb 2014 à 12:34:25 (-0700), Alex Williamson wrote :
> > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 19:10 +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > After the IRC conversation we had a few days ago I understood that guest
> > > IOMMU
The Wednesday 12 Feb 2014 à 12:34:25 (-0700), Alex Williamson wrote :
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 19:10 +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > After the IRC conversation we had a few days ago I understood that guest
> > IOMMU
> > was not implemented.
> >
> > I have a real use case for it:
>
The Wednesday 12 Feb 2014 à 12:34:25 (-0700), Alex Williamson wrote :
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 19:10 +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
> >
> > After the IRC conversation we had a few days ago I understood that guest
> > IOMMU
> > was not implemented.
> >
> > I have a real use case for it:
>
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 19:10 +0100, Benoît Canet wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> After the IRC conversation we had a few days ago I understood that guest IOMMU
> was not implemented.
>
> I have a real use case for it:
>
> Cisco usnic allow to write MPI applications while driving the network card in
> users
Hi Alex,
After the IRC conversation we had a few days ago I understood that guest IOMMU
was not implemented.
I have a real use case for it:
Cisco usnic allow to write MPI applications while driving the network card in
userspace in order to optimize the latency. It's made for compute clusters.
