Re: [Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review using Rietveld

2011-01-27 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Patchwork is a nice tool but I found a few issues with it that really > deterred me from using it: > > 1) it's all or nothing in terms of whether maintainers use it.  if everyone > isn't on top of keeping it clean, you end up with a terribl

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review using Rietveld

2011-01-27 Thread Peter Maydell
On 27 January 2011 17:31, Anthony Liguori wrote: > Patchwork is a nice tool but I found a few issues with it that really > deterred me from using it: > 2) it doesn't understand patches series.  A 20 patch series gets applied all > at once, yet you have to update status for each patch.  That's ann

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review using Rietveld

2011-01-27 Thread Anthony Liguori
On 01/27/2011 01:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Forwarding this from the GCC mailing list. Since patchwork isn't more than a mail archive the way it's implemented in QEMU, this may be a more interesting possibility. Patchwork is a nice tool but I found a few issues with it that really deterred

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review using Rietveld

2011-01-27 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 01/27/2011 11:19 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:55:30AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> >>> Forwarding this from the GCC mailing list.  Since patchwork isn't >>> more than a mail archive the way it's implement

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review using Rietveld

2011-01-27 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 01/27/2011 11:19 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:55:30AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Forwarding this from the GCC mailing list. Since patchwork isn't more than a mail archive the way it's implemented in QEMU, this may be a more interesting possibility. What features a

Re: [Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review using Rietveld

2011-01-27 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:55:30AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Forwarding this from the GCC mailing list. Since patchwork isn't > more than a mail archive the way it's implemented in QEMU, this may > be a more interesting possibility. What features are you looking for beyond archiving? It woul

[Qemu-devel] Fwd: Proposal: Improving patch tracking and review using Rietveld

2011-01-26 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Forwarding this from the GCC mailing list. Since patchwork isn't more than a mail archive the way it's implemented in QEMU, this may be a more interesting possibility. Paolo At Google we use a code review tool which was open sourced a couple of years ago: Rietveld (http://code.google.com/app